SHANGHAI DECLARATION

REPORT TO INCP

16 OCTOBER 2004

 

(INCD delegation to INCP meeting: Korkor Amarteifio, Leonardo Brant, Jacques Béhenzin, Garry Neil and Danny Yung.) 

 

INCD is a worldwide network of individuals and organisations in the cultural sector working to counter the adverse effects of economic globalisation on arts and culture.   INCD has more than 300 members in 71 countries, a number of which are international organisations with a presence in other countries.   Our scope is truly global.

 

INCD has organized a parallel meeting to the INCP meetings for the past five years.  This week, the newly elected Steering Committee of the INCD, comprising 19 people from 18 countries, met to review all of the issues we are facing.  On October 13, we were privileged to be joined by 29 representatives of Chinese civil society and a number of observers from other countries to discuss tri-sector collaboration, cultural development, the theme Traditional Cultures and Modernisation as well as cultural economics.  Our agenda for the day was framed together with our Chinese partners.

 

Convention on the Protection of the Diversity of Cultural Contents and Artistic Expressions

We find ourselves at a historic moment.  Last year, UNESCO launched the project to conclude a Convention on the protection of the diversity of cultural contents and artistic expressions.  This is a turning point in the global debate on the role of culture for sustainable development and the human condition.  Countries of the world have a window of opportunity to agree on a binding global framework that will recognize the right of governments to protect their cultural identities and to promote cultural diversity through appropriate policies.  Given the background of global trade negotiations, it is crucially important for the Convention to be adopted in 2005, since it will establish as a global principle that cultural goods and services are like no others. 

 

INCD congratulates INCP for its efforts, the INCP has played a key role in putting this issue onto the international agenda.

 

The INCD was an active participant in the recent Intergovernmental Meeting of Experts in Paris and we were delighted to see representatives from 132 countries meeting for the purpose of negotiating a Convention.  At the meeting, INCD welcomed the Draft put forward by the UNESCO secretariat as a good basis on which to begin the negotiations between governments.  In two of our interventions, we were requested formally by the NGO-UNESCO Liaison Committee to speak on behalf of numerous organizations maintaining formal relations with UNESCO. 

 

INCD observed that there was an uneven level of understanding among government delegations about the fundamental purpose of the Convention.  Given the challenges this presents, we believe it is important for the INCP members to work together at UNESCO in the coming period and to take a leadership role in that forum.

 

We continue to support the need for a timely and effective Convention.  To achieve its objectives, we believe the language of the Convention must be adjusted.  Since we share many of these perspectives with INCP, we invite your governments to consider submitting our proposals into the UNESCO process.  Our submissions to UNESCO are based on the following fundamental objectives:

 

  1. The status of the Convention must be equivalent to the trade agreements.  Neither option provided in Article 19 of the Draft meets that objective.
  2. The Convention must be an effective tool for countries of the South to develop their creative capacity and cultural industries consistent with other UNESCO instruments that recognize and promote the integral relationship of culture and development.
  3. The Convention must acknowledge the broad scope of policy tools that are used to promote cultural diversity and the right of governments to adapt and adopt new ones in the coming years to respond to technological developments and changing circumstances and needs.

 

INCD will submit a formal intervention by the November 15 UNESCO deadline.  In response to the Paris discussions, we will amend our earlier submission by further strengthening the provisions we have put forward about Articles 19, 13 and 21 which deal with the relationship of this Convention to existing treaties and agreements and by proposing changes to ensure that all government policies that directly or indirectly affect culture are covered fully by the Convention provisions. 

 

We also believe the text must provide for the adjudication of disputes where both states are parties to the Convention, a system that permits a member to seek an opinion where a dispute exists with a state that is not a party to the Convention and an ability for individuals of a state party who are entitled to enjoy the protections of this Convention to raise concerns about non-compliance.  We will also call on governments to ensure that the follow-up mechanisms have sufficient resources to carry out the tasks assigned to them.

 

Meanwhile, it is vital for all of us to continue to work to ensure that governments refrain from making commitments in bilateral and multilateral trade talks that would affect their ability to implement or change cultural policies.  In particular, we must all be vigilant about the recent decisions of the WTO to reinvigorate talks on the General Agreement on Trade in Services within the framework of the Doha Round of negotiations

 

Finally, we note our concern about the emerging role of the WTO in the development of the Convention.  We understand that there will soon be a series of meetings of the WTO in Geneva to determine its position on the Convention, in which government trade representatives will be participating.  It is critical for Ministers of Culture to use their competence in the cultural arena to frame their government’s position and as a basis for their representations at the WTO.  

 

Traditional Cultures and Modernisation

We had a rich exchange of views with our Chinese friends and colleagues on this theme.  Our collaboration with representatives of Chinese civil society will continue as we both work to promote cultural diversity and to support threatened languages and cultures including those of indigenous peoples.

 

We understand that modernisation is significantly about development and technology and while these processes are often a threat to the survival of traditional cultures, we do not believe this is an inevitable result.  Traditional cultures and their knowledge can contribute greatly to the modernisation process and we must work together to ensure this happens, through supporting these cultures, developing the necessary regimes to protect legally their Traditional Knowledge and other measures.  Technology can also be an instrument for promoting the development of traditional cultures and advancing cultural diversity.

 

INCD and our Chinese colleagues understand that while governments and the private sector often measure development and modernisation strictly in economic terms, the most fundamental measurement must be surely the humanity of societies.  We need to ensure that development projects respect local cultures and that development of their creative capacity and cultural industries becomes an integral part of sustainable development.  We note that the Convention can provide new models for cooperation for development and the INCD proposal for specific market access provisions is one such model.

 

In concluding our joint session, Chinese and international delegates agreed that the Government of the People’s Republic of China can play a key role in the process of developing the Convention on the protection of the diversity of cultural contents and artistic expressions and we look forward to collaboration.  China has a powerful and growing economy, a vibrant culture and a policy based on the principles of sustainable development that could be useful to others.

 

 

INCD Work Plan

The Shanghai event was the Fifth Annual Meeting of the INCD and we approved an ambitious work plan for the next year.  In addition to working on the Convention and trade issues, we intend to move forward with our next major campaign – advocating that development agencies allocate an appropriate and fixed percentage of their resources to cultural projects.  We will also work to find ways to ensure that cultural impact assessment becomes a fully integrated part of sustainable development indicators.  Finally, INCD will launch a discussion of how cultural diversity could be promoted by strengthening cultural rights established by various international instruments.   We look forward to learning about the future plans of the INCP beyond the necessary focus on the UNESCO Convention.

 

Our agenda of meetings will include a national meeting in the United States and regional meetings in Latin America, Francophone Africa, Europe and the Caribbean.  We have plans for other meetings that are contingent on finding the resources.  As INCD members continue to work on a local and national level we look forward to close collaboration with our respective culture ministers.

 

We will organize the Seventh Annual INCD Conference in Senegal in 2005 in collaboration with the next INCP meeting.  The provisional theme of our Conference will be Cultural Diversity and Development.

 

Future of the INCP

Since it is finally being recognized that culture is a life-defining issue, we believe it is critically important for the world’s culture ministers to establish the INCP as its united front for taking a proactive role in the global debates.  We are excited to see the expansion of the INCP in the past year and understand this brings opportunities and challenges.  We look forward to finding ways to collaborate on the full range of issues that we are addressing.  We will continue to engage with other ministers as well since the issues around which we are working to promote, develop and preserve cultural diversity extend broadly. 

 

We urge culture ministers to engage with officials in trade and finance and with representatives at the WTO in Geneva to ensure that their interventions reflect INCP positions on the UNESCO Convention.  We hope that Geneva-based representatives of INCP members will advocate collectively in the WTO for an effective and timely Convention.

 

 

INCD Steering Committee

Korkor Amarteifio, Ghana

Octavio Arbelarz, Colombia

Jacques B­éhanzin, Bénin – Co-Chair

Leonardo Brant, Brazil – Co-Chair

James Early, United States

May Fung, Hong Kong

Mireille Gagné, Canada – Co-Chair

Jan Granvik, Sweden

Jane Kelsey, New Zealand

Ludwig Laher, Austria

Nise Malange, South Africa

Katerina Marinaki, Greece

Nina Obuljen, Croatia

Bruce Paddington, Trinidad and Tobago

Sultan Muhammad Razzak, Bangladesh

Rafael Segovia, México

Yvon Thiec, France – Co-Chair

Verena WiedemannGermany

Danny Yung, Hong Kong-China – Co-Chair